Read an argument in the Scotsman newspaper (sic) the other day. Basically it was as follows - The only thing saving
from being the North Korea of Europe is – you’ve guessed it - the Scotland Union.
Starting with the statement that no reasonable argument for independence has yet been put forward and that the move for separation is based on xenophobia and stirring up cultural differences, it was quite easy to see where it was heading. It continued - that despite the global recession and especially the Euro-zone crisis; most people in Scotland still eat well, still have cars less than 10 years old, still have free education and healthcare, still have flat screen TVs, had a turkey at Christmas and are still able to enjoy all the trappings of modern life and that many countries in Europe do not enjoy such a lifestyle.
All this was thanks to the
Union. And no doubt the great lie that is
the subsidising of
through the Barnet Formula. Scotland
It goes without saying that this is a typical Unionist argument. Basically, the people of
would not have these things if they governed their own affairs. There is also
an argument however, that they might well have had more, had they been governing their
own affairs for the last 50 years. Scotland
How reasonable is the statement that separation is driven by xenophobia and the stirring up of cultural differences. It is all-encompassing statement which fails the test of reason quite markedly.
Just how does a dislike of foreigners promote a move for independence? Any racial intolerance here seems to be on the part of the Unionist argument. For there is little doubt that for “xenophobia” we are meant to read “anti-English”. A puerile statement that can be easily dismissed. Unless of course there is evidence to show that those who support independence are, in fact, anti-English. On the other hand, it may mean that a newly independent
will go into the grown-up world as a nation of xenophobes - chauvinistic and showing a
dislike for all foreigners. Scotland
It may come as a surprise to some but there are English people living in Scotland who, after the reality check that comes with living north of the border, vote SNP and support Independence.
On the point of cultural differences. These exist between all the nations in the
and are well documented. Surely they are integral to any and all national
identities. Why this should now have taken on a sinister form is unclear.
Moreover, to suggest that a preference for Scottish independence is based on
the manufactured heritage that continues to blight the country at the expense of its history is an attack on the
intelligence of its people. UK
If by “free education” we are meant to acknowledge that
offers what would be expected of any modern society it is hard to see how that
has anything to do with the London Government. Indeed, by refusing to burden
its normally domiciled students in further education with tuition fees it does
a great deal more that those who govern Scotland .
The same is true of health care. The reason for the UK languishing 12th in the European table for best heath care is surely not attributable to the country where eye examinations and care for the elderly are free and prescription charges have been abolished. This would not be the case, as has been patently demonstrated in the past, if such decisions were left to Westminster.
As for Flat-screen TVs and
Has anyone recently tried to but a TV with a cathode-ray tube? As for a Turkeys
at Christmas. I think you will find that most people that celebrate Christmas
will have enjoyed whatever their traditional Christmas meal is. That the people of Scotland wouldn't normally eat well for no other reason than Turkey
becoming independent is a ludicrous suggestion. the country
And so to all the trappings of modern life that many countries in
do not enjoy. I would suggest that such countries are to be found in Eastern
Europe, where the continent’s 10 poorest nations are. These are
the countries which are still recovering from Communism and the outside influence and interference of
the Soviet Union. I can’t think of one in Western
So, basically, it is the same old argument. Everything that
has is down to the Scotland Union. It has nothing to do with its
people who, if left in charge of their own affairs would be paying for
education and healthcare, drive old cars, sit in front of blank TV screens,
have bread and dripping on Christmas day, pretty much starve for the rest of
the year and hate every other country in the world.
Rational arguments indeed.